- #Diskkeeper alternative software software
- #Diskkeeper alternative software professional
- #Diskkeeper alternative software windows
I left all the settings at their defaults, since most users aren’t likely to want to go tweaking everything. That said, I subjected it to a week and a half long battery of abuse and misuse.
Given I’d just cleaned up stale VMs, that sounds pretty reasonable overall. Diskeeper 2011, when run for the first time claimed that my mechanical disk was less than 5% fragmented.
#Diskkeeper alternative software windows
Applications have gotten somewhat better at avoiding fragmentation, and the Windows utility has improved. The OS and a number of frequently used applications reside on a 120GB solid state drive.įirst though, how does Diskkeper 2011 work compared to the included Windows defragmentation utility when simply defragmenting? The answer is: reply hazy, ask again. VMware Workstation can be incredibly hard on mechanical disks, and that’s where I locate almost all of my VMs due to space constraints-the average guest VM size is 64GB. It’s for VMware Workstation, the primary consumer and abuser of system resources. My 12GB of RAM isn’t for loading games into RAMdisks, and it isn’t for show. While I may use my system for gaming, calling it a “home” system does it a disservice.
#Diskkeeper alternative software professional
I-FAAST isn’t available in the Home edition of Diskeeper 2011-only for Professional and up. The second is called I-FAAST, which monitors the most frequently accessed files to improve file access speed. This intercepts disk writes for both spinning and solid state disks, and attempts to prevent fragmentation from even occurring in the first place. With Diskeeper 2011 Professional, they’ve added two key features we’ll be looking at. This has been true since Windows NT, and has created a cottage industry of defragmentation software. But even in Windows 7, Microsoft’s included defragmentation utility is, shall we say, not exactly that great. Say whatever you like defragmentation is absolutely proven to help on Windows systems of all flavors-be it FAT or NTFS. But before we get to the results, let’s examine what Diskeeper 2011 offers users.įirst, Diskeeper is for defragmentation of file systems. Therefore, the question must be asked: What is Diskeeper doing to remain relevant? Will we even need them in another few years?įor the past week and a half, I’ve been putting Diskeeper 2011 through its paces, which is to say I have been most unkind to my system, and truly hammered on every resource relentlessly. Of course, all of that went out the window with SSD technology, but most computers still use mechanical hard drives.
#Diskkeeper alternative software software
Defragmentation is the process in which the software finds all the files, creates large enough gaps for the entire thing, and writes them into contiguous blocks so that the hard drive only has to put the head down once, read the entire file, and then go on to the next task.
This leaves the hard drive having to “jump all over the place” to read files. As you use a computer, the file system gets more and more fragmented as holes are created and filled. It then uses an index to look up where all parts of a file are before it assembles it back together to give to the user. If a small “hole” exists, the operating system will put a part of the file in that hole, and put the rest elsewhere. The core concept behind Diskeeper is that a computer will write files to a disk wherever there is space. The defragmenter that comes built-in to Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 is a pared-down version of Diskeeper. Originally developed to improve performance on VAX machines, Diskeeper eventually found its way into Microsoft Windows operating systems. Diskeeper has been around since 1981, a big accomplishment for a software company.
0 kommentar(er)
